企业创新方式选择对商业模式创新的影响研究 本期目录 >>
Title: Impact of enterprise innovation type choices on business model innovation
作者 孙永磊;陈劲;宋晶
Author(s): SUN Yong-lei; CHEN Jin; SONG Jing
摘要: 主要研究企业的创新方式选择对不同类型的商业模式创新的差异化影响,基于组织双元性理论,区分了五种不同创新方式:渐进性创新、突破性创新、差异性创新、整体性创新和交互性创新,提出创新方式与商业模式创新的研究假设,结合我国企业创新的实践数据进行实证分析。主要结论包括:除交互性创新之外,其他创新方式均有助于效率型商业模式创新,而突破性创新、差异性创新和交互性创新能够驱动新颖型商业模式创新的产生,渐进性创新对新颖型商业模式创新具有阻碍作用。
Abstract: With the rapid development of informational technology, business model has became the common focus in both theory and practice. Many enterprises has obtained generous returns through business model innovation, and the scholars also have found the business model innovation could help the enterprise help to improve their performance, obtain the sustainable competitive advantage. However, the existing research has paid little attention on business model innovation’s antecedent variables. Meanwhile the important role of innovation to enterprise sustainable development has get the general agreement, and the different of enterprise innovation type choices may lead to the difference of innovation output result, is the key factor to decide the enterprises maintain sustainable competitive advantage, the innovation type choices is also the important influence factor of the business model innovation. But the existing studies of the relationship between enterprise innovation type choices and business model innovation mostly stay in the theoretical analysis, lack of the strong pertinency research finding, especially in the field of empirical study with innovation practice data in our country, unable to guide the innovation type choices of enterprise innovation practice. This paper mainly research the impact of enterprise innovation type choices on different business model innovation. Based on the organizational ambidexterity theory, we distinguish five different innovation types, incremental innovation, radical innovation, diverseness innovation, integrated innovation and interactive innovation. On the basis of the related literature, we construct theoretical model based on theoretical analysis and propose hypotheses. We also empirically analyze the survey data of the bio pharmacy and electronic information. The results show that: in addition to interactive innovation, the other innovation types are all beneficial to the promotion of efficiency-centered business model innovation; while the radical innovation, diverseness innovation and interactive innovation have significant positive relationships with novelty-centered business model innovation. Through this research, is helpful to expand the scope of organizational ambidexterity theory, in the study of incremental innovation and radical innovation, from diverseness innovation, integrated innovation and interactive innovation investigate the enterprise innovation type choices, it can enhance the racticality and universality in the innovation type research field. On the other hand, from the perspective of innovation type choies to discuss the business model innovation, is the beneficial supplement and important development of the business model field. In the aspect of practice, this paper could help to understand the relationship between innovation type choices and business model innovation, and guide the process of the business model update.
关键词: 创新方式选择;双元创新;商业模式创新;实证研究
Keywords: Innovation type choices; Ambidextrous innovation; Business model innovation; Empirical study
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目;国家自然科学基金资助项目;国家自然科学基金资助项目;国家自然科学基金资助项目;国家自然科学基金资助项目
发表期数: 2018年 第2期
中图分类号: 文献标识码: 文章编号:
参考文献/References:

[1] Zott C., Amit R.. Business model design: an activity system perspective[J]. Long range planning,2010,43(2):216-226.

[2] Teece D.. Business models, business strategy and innovation[J]. Long Range Planning,2010,43(2):172-194.

[3] Zott C., Amit R.. The fit between product market strategy and business model: implications for firm performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2008,29(1):1-26.

[4] 吴晓波,朱培忠,吴东,姚明明.后发者如何实现快速追赶?--一个二次商业模式创新和技术创新的共演模型[J].科学学研究,2013,31(11):1726-1735.

[5] Chesbrough H.. Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers [J]. Long Range Planning,2010,43(2-3):354-363.

[6] Zott C., Amit R., Massa L.. The Business Model: Recent Developments and Future Research[J]. Journal of management,2011,37(4):1019-1042.

[7] Song M., Thieme J.. The Role of Suppliers in Market Intelligence Gathering for Radical and Incremental Innovation[J]. Journal of product innovation management,2009,26(1):43-57.

[8] 党兴华,孙永磊,宋晶.不同信任情景下双元创新对网络惯例的影响[J].管理科学,2013,26(4):25-34.

[9] Chesbrough H., Rosenbloom R.. The rolr of the business model in capturing value fom innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology Spin-off companies[J]. Industrial and corporate change,2002,11(3):533-544.

[10] Maglio P., Spohrer J.. A service science perspective on business model innovation[J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2013,42(5):665-670.

[11] 项国鹏,杨卓,罗兴武.价值创造视角下的商业模式研究回顾与理论框架构建--基于扎根思想的编码与提炼[J]. 外国经济与管理,2014,36(6):32-41.

[12] Amit R., Zott C.. Value creation in e-business[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2001,22(6-7):493-520.

[13] 龚丽敏,魏江,董忆,江诗松,周江华,向永胜.商业模式研究现状和流派识别:基于1997-2010 年SSCI引用情况的分析[J].管理评论,2013,25(6):131-140.

[14] 王雪冬,董大海.商业模式创新概念研究述评与展望[J].外国经济与管理,2013,35(11):29-37.

[15] 郭京京,陈琦.电子商务商业模式设计对企业绩效的影响机制研究[J].管理工程学报,2014,28(3):83-90.

[16] Cao Q., Gedajlovic E., Zhang H.. Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects[J]. Organization Science,2009,20(4):781-796.

[17] March J.. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J]. Organization Science,1991,2(1):71-87.

[18] He Z., Wong P.. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis[J]. Organization Science,2004,15(4):481-494.

[19] Li Y., Wei Z., Liu Y.. Strategic Orientations, Knowledge Acquisition, and Firm Performance: The Perspective of the Vendor in Cross-Border Outsourcing[J]. Journal of Management Studies,2010,47(8):1457-1482.

[20] Gassmann O., Widenmayer B., Zeschky M.. Implementing radical innovation in the business: the role of transition modes in large firms[J]. R&D Management,2012,42(2):120-132.

[21] 孙永磊,党兴华,宋晶.基于网络惯例的双元能力对合作创新绩效的影响[J].管理科学,2014,27(2):38-47.

[22] Atuahene-Gima K. Resolving the capability: rigidity paradox in new product innovation [J]. Journal of marketing,2005,69(4):61-83.

[23] 郑晓明,丁玲,欧阳桃花.双元能力促进企业服务敏捷性——海底捞公司发展历程案例研究 [J].管理世界,2012,(2):131-147.

[24] 何红渠,沈鲸.环境不确定性下中国国际化企业双元能力与绩效关系[J].系统工程,2012,30(8):30-37.

[25] Lubatkin M., Simsek Z., Ling Y., Veiga J.. Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration[J]. Journal of Management,2006,32(5):646-672.

[26] Pentland B., Feldman M., Becker M., Liu P.. Dynamics of organizational routines: a generative model[J]. Journal of Management Studies 2012,49(8):1484-1508.

[27] 党兴华,孙永磊.技术创新网络位置对网络惯例的影响研究——以组织间信任为中介变量[J].科研管理,2013,34(4):1-8.

[28] Eisenhardt K., Martin J.. Dynamic capabilities: what are they?[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(10-11):1105-1121.

[29] Boumgarden P., Nickerson J., Zenger T.. Sailing into the wind: Exploring the relationships among ambidexterity, vacillation, and organizational performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2012,33(6):587-610.

[30] 张玉利,李乾文.公司创业导向,双元能力与组织绩效[J].管理科学学报,2009,12(1):137-152.